PTI Reacts to Supreme Court’s Bhutto Verdict: Will Imran Khan Wait 50 Years for Fair Trial?

PTI has demanded the immediate release of imprisoned leaders and workers of Tehreek-e-Insaf, including Imran Khan.

Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) has responded to the Supreme Court’s verdict on the judicial reference concerning Zulfikar Ali Bhutto, raising concerns about the prolonged legal process. In a statement issued by PTI, it was asserted that the fact that it took the Supreme Court 50 years to conclude that Zulfikar Ali Bhutto did not receive a fair trial raises questions about the justice system. The statement questioned whether Imran Khan will also have to wait 50 years for a fair trial. According to a PTI spokesperson, the significance of the Supreme Court’s decision in Zulfikar Ali Bhutto’s case lies in the realization that he did not receive a fair trial. This prompts the urgent need for the Supreme Court to use its full authority to prevent miscarriages of justice. PTI has demanded the immediate release of imprisoned leaders and workers of Tehreek-e-Insaf, including Imran Khan and his family members, and thousands of innocent workers, and urged for fair trials to be conducted to address false cases against them.

Peshawar High Court Bars Elected Members from Taking Oath on Reserved Seats.

Peshawar : The Peshawar High Court has restrained elected members from taking oath on reserved seats in the National Assembly. The court has directed the National Assembly Speaker not to administer oaths to members elected on specific reserved seats until tomorrow. According to details, the Peshawar High Court, on the application of the Sunni Ittehad Council, has ordered the National Assembly Speaker not to administer oaths to members elected on specific reserved seats until tomorrow. A two-member bench comprising Justice Ishtiaq Ibrahim and Justice Shakil Ahmed heard the case. Read more: Chairman PTI says assembly isn’t bogus, Qaiser and others still claim it is The court, while preventing newly elected members from taking oaths on reserved seats, has issued notices to the Election Commission and other parties, seeking their response. The decision comes as a significant development in the ongoing legal proceedings regarding the oath-taking process, adding a layer of scrutiny to the election process and parliamentary procedures.