IHC summons FIA, IB’s DGs in Audio Leaks case
In a significant legal development, former Chairman of Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI), Imran Khan, has taken his plea to the Supreme Court after the Islamabad High Court (IHC) rejected his request to halt the Toshakhana trial case. The PTI founder’s initial petition aimed to suspend the decision related to Toshakhana, enabling his participation in upcoming elections.
The Islamabad High Court’s dismissal of the plea prompted Imran Khan to escalate the matter to the apex court, underscoring the gravity of the case and its potential implications on his political future.
Imran Khan’s lawyer, Intizar Panjotha, raised concerns about an unexpected incident during the Supreme Court proceedings. According to Panjotha, the clerk’s mobile phone and the appeal documents were reportedly taken away, sparking surprise given the high-profile nature of the case and the sanctity of the Supreme Court premises.
The Toshakhana case involves allegations related to the misuse of state resources, and the decision to suspend the trial could potentially impact Imran Khan’s eligibility for participation in upcoming elections.
Legal experts and political observers are closely monitoring the developments, as Imran Khan’s appeal to the Supreme Court adds a new layer of complexity to the ongoing legal proceedings. The incident involving the disappearance of documents within the Supreme Court premises raises questions about the security and integrity of the judicial process.
As the legal battle unfolds, the nation awaits the Supreme Court’s decision on whether to suspend the Toshakhana trial, a decision that could have far-reaching consequences for one of Pakistan’s prominent political figures. The case highlights the intersection of law and politics, underscoring the importance of a transparent and fair legal process in shaping the country’s political landscape.
While,
“Audio Leaks Case: Islamabad High Court Summons Intelligence Bureau and FIA Directors General”
The Islamabad High Court (IHC) has summoned the Directors General (DGs) of the Intelligence Bureau (IB) and the Federal Investigation Agency (FIA) in a significant development related to the audio leaks case. The order, issued by Justice Babar Sattar, requires the DGs to appear in person on February 19 to address concerns raised in petitions by Bushra Bibi and former Chief Justice of Pakistan’s son, Najam us Saqib.
During the proceedings, Justice Babar Sattar sought answers to critical questions regarding the recording of audio involving Bushra Bibi and Latif Khosa. The court inquired about the origin of the leaked audio, the identity of the account holder, and how the recordings were made.
More From Daily The Destination: Imran Khan’s nomination papers submitted in Mianwali
Emphasizing the role of the IB, Justice Babar Sattar directed the intelligence agency to conduct a thorough investigation and submit a detailed report. The court acknowledged the submission of a report by a secret agency through the Ministry of Defence but noted its limitation in identifying the source of the leaked information on social media.
The order further outlined that the IB is tasked with determining the social media accounts responsible for the unauthorized release of the audio. A deadline of three weeks was set for the IB to complete the inquiry and submit its comprehensive report.
The court also sought information on the federal government’s stance regarding the recording of calls, with the Attorney General emphasizing the necessity to protect the privacy and rights of all citizens.
The FIA, which sought additional time to submit its reply, was directed to provide a detailed report on the social media accounts through which the leaked audios surfaced. The DG of FIA is also required to appear in court to brief on the methods of surveillance and recording.
This legal development underscores the court’s commitment to unraveling the complexities surrounding electronic surveillance and maintaining the privacy rights of citizens. As the case unfolds, it brings into focus the broader issues of accountability and transparency in matters of electronic surveillance in Pakistan.
Comments are closed, but trackbacks and pingbacks are open.