US Senate Challenges Trump’s Authority Over Iran Conflict

WASHINGTON: (Web Desk) –  The administration of Donald Trump is facing increasing political scrutiny over the ongoing conflict with Iran after the US Senate moved forward with a resolution designed to restrict the president’s authority to continue military operations against Tehran. On Wednesday, senators approved the measure in a 50-47 vote, sending it to the House of Representatives for consideration later this week.

The proposed resolution demands an end to military action against Iran and calls for the withdrawal of American troops unless Congress formally grants approval under the 1973 War Powers Act. Previous efforts to advance the legislation had stalled because several senators backing the measure were absent for medical reasons, resulting in a tied vote.

Asian Markets Mixed Amid US Iran Negotiation Hopes

According to reports from Agence France-Presse, Tuesday’s procedural vote marked the first successful congressional step in more than 11 weeks toward limiting Trump’s military authority in the Iran conflict. The development reflects growing concern in Washington over the financial burden of the war, military preparedness, and the lack of a clear long-term strategy.

Although the resolution carries strong political symbolism, it still faces major hurdles. The Republican-controlled House is expected to resist the effort, and even if it passes Congress, Trump is widely expected to veto the legislation. Still, the vote exposed rising unease among some Republicans as the conflict enters its third month and estimated costs reportedly surpass $30 billion.

The resolution invokes the 1973 War Powers Act, legislation introduced after the Vietnam War to prevent presidents from engaging in prolonged military campaigns without congressional approval. Democratic Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer sharply criticized Trump ahead of the vote, warning that unchecked military authority could deepen the crisis. He argued that Congress must reassert its constitutional role in decisions involving war.