Unpacking the Aftermath: Supreme Court’s Verdict on PTI Symbol and Its Implications for Pakistan’s Upcoming Elections
Written by KASHIF RAFFIQUE ABBASI
Pakistan finds itself at the center of political turbulence as the Supreme Court recently upheld the decision to strip the Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) of its iconic cricket bat electoral symbol, just weeks before the scheduled February 8, 2024, national elections. The three-member bench consisting of Chief Justice Qazi Faez Isa, Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar, and Justice Musarrat Hilali reached this decision following a two-day live broadcast of proceedings, affirming the Election Commission of Pakistan’s (ECP) appeal against the Peshawar High Court’s previous ruling.
The verdict, grounded in technicalities, has ignited controversy, positioning the Supreme Court as a potential facilitator for other political parties. While the Pakistan Peoples Party (PPP), Awami National Party (ANP), and Jamaat-e-Islami (JI) refrained from endorsing the decision, the Pakistan Muslim League-Nawaz (PML-N), PTI’s main rival in Punjab, has embraced it as an opportunity for political gains.
The decision has faced condemnation from influential journalists, including Hamid Mir, Sana Bucha, Saqib Bashir, and Asad Tor, who have raised concerns about the impartiality of the judiciary. Michael Kugelman, the director of the South Asia Institute at the Wilson Center in Washington, noted the persistent issues surrounding election integrity in Pakistan. Kugelman highlighted the perceived pre-poll rigging, stating that PTI’s leaders have been jailed, electoral candidates’ nomination papers denied, online rallies/fundraisers blocked, and now, PTI denied the use of its election symbol.
The PTI, undeterred by the loss of its cricket bat symbol, has declared its intent to participate in the upcoming elections with independent candidates, each using individual symbols. Critics argue that this move may confuse voters and inadvertently benefit rival party candidates.
The Human Rights Council of Pakistan expressed concern over the decision’s potential impact on the transparency of the 2024 general elections, while lawyer Jibran Nasir and other legal experts warned of the vulnerability of winning PTI candidates to state pressure and political bribes.
The withdrawal of PTI’s level playing field petition from the Supreme Court, citing a lack of confidence, has exacerbated tensions between the political party and the judiciary. The international media has joined the conversation, highlighting the risk of pre-poll rigging and election irregularities, which could undermine the credibility of the elections and influence foreign policy dynamics.
Amidst the uncertainty, Imran Khan, PTI’s incarcerated leader, has vowed to fight until the last ball. Social media activists from PTI have initiated campaigns on platforms like Twitter and TikTok, rallying support and spreading awareness about the different symbols allotted to PTI candidates.
As the Election Commission of Pakistan assigns various symbols to PTI candidates, including a bowl, shoe, harmonium, chimta (tongs), hen, bottle, pomegranate, and kettle, citizens are engaging in awareness campaigns, expressing solidarity with PTI.
In conclusion, the evolving situation necessitates a comprehensive dialogue involving think tanks, the establishment, and influential institutions. A fair and level playing field must be established, ensuring equal opportunities and freedoms for all political parties. Imposing an unpopular party on the people could have severe repercussions both domestically and internationally, underscoring the imperative for reason and sensibility to prevail.
More From Daily The Destination: Severe fog leads to motorway closures and flight disruptions
