By: Advocate Gulsher
With start of 21st century new discourse and debate tossed and totaled on the rising role of Artificial Intelligence as to replace human physical activity, in other words it is designed to act like human being. Undoubtedly as well as indisputably, it poses a serious threats to human existence but its benefits in form of assistance to human being also appreciative and admirable at length.
As this dynamic field is too large and long in both form and substance can be discussed completely in this take but here only Chabot and chatGPT are the part of participation and explanation. Hence, pros and cons of both the tools of Artificial Intelligence are here to be discussed in following paragraphs.
As world scholars and researchers brought their ideas simply seemed collectively taken and published as an established view supported by an academic journal namely-
Finance Research Letters that deal with all types documents which discuss and analyze the all financial issues and ideas, explained that Chabot and chatGPT have occupied very considerable place. These tools of AI are so ready and smart they could write and prepare the financial documents and financial budgets provided with facts and figures be made part of the paper.
Furthermore, college and school level essays and assignments are being prepared and written with help of these two tools. Such performance not only emerging but world has accepted this in very warm and excited manner.
Nothing in this world is perfect to be suited with suits and solutions of the world problems. As the matter of cons of these two tools is concerned, there are certain negative aspects of the tools exist and agreed but also seen when they are used. Likewise,
if one give command to chatGPT to write an article, essay, research paper or any other sort of writing task, no doubt they write what comes in their domain in form of data but still serious lack of novelty, creativity, personality found in the task done by the both.
As personal experience, my friend Mr. Sameed Malik asked me that chaGPT is nice tool that not only saves time but also makes things easy for the lawyers and writers, I replied okay, when I asked him to give it a command to write a writ petition for filling before High Court Islamabad, he said okay and commanded chatGPT.
After few minutes, no doubt chatGPT wrote a writ petition but was useless for me. The reason the petition was like a book or academic based information not worthy to be filed before the concerned forum.
In the course of human recorded history new fields come and human accepts them but they cannot replace human activity. The reason in this logic is that any written work if devoid of feelings and personal experiences then it would be of no use in the field. Therefore, both the tools can help but cannot fully support and replace human being creativity and cannot inject feelings and sentiments that human being can do.
Comments are closed, but trackbacks and pingbacks are open.