Bilawal Bhutto-Zardari challenges Nawaz Sharif’s bid for fourth term, alleges ‘Selection’

Referring to Imran & Nawaz simultaneously, Bilawal asserted that the country cannot afford a ‘player’ or a fourth-timer amid economic turmoil.

As the political landscape heats up ahead of the February 8 general elections, Pakistan Peoples Party (PPP) Chairman Bilawal Bhutto-Zardari launched a scathing critique against Pakistan Muslim League-Nawaz (PML-N) supremo Nawaz Sharif. Accusing the three-time former prime minister of seeking a fourth term via ‘selection,’ Bilawal addressed a political gathering in Lower Dir.

In his remarks, Bilawal questioned Nawaz Sharif’s legitimacy, stating, “Mian sahib, you have come [to power] three times via ‘selection.’ At least be ‘elected’ for your fourth tenure [as prime minister this time].” The PPP leader’s comments reflect the escalating verbal showdown between the PPP and PML-N, former allies, over allegations of special treatment and an uneven playing field.

Bilawal emphasized the importance of politics that respects the sanctity of the vote and warned that neither the public nor he would accept Nawaz Sharif as the country’s premier if he comes to power through ‘selection.’ He pledged resistance against any ‘selected’ ruler.

Criticizing Nawaz’s attempt at a fourth term, Bilawal questioned the significance of a person who has failed three times seeking power once more. He accused Nawaz Sharif of engaging in ‘revenge politics’ during previous tenures and highlighted the PML-N supremo’s complaints and legal troubles after his ousters.

More From Daily The Destination: Maryam Responds to PPP’s Call for Equal Playing Field, Highlights Nawaz Sharif’s Struggles

Referring to Imran Khan and Nawaz Sharif simultaneously, Bilawal asserted that the country cannot afford a ‘player’ or a fourth-timer amid economic turmoil. Stressing the need for ‘new politics,’ he warned that Nawaz would revert to old ways if elected for the fourth time.

Bilawal continued his criticism of Imran Khan, citing a principle difference with the PTI founder related to coming to power through ‘selection’ and relying on an umpire’s finger for politics. The exchange underscores the intensifying political competition as parties gear up for the upcoming elections.”